
Free to start · Sign in to save results
ManuscriptIQ evaluates your manuscript across 12 professional publishing categories using industry standards from the Chicago Manual of Style, IngramSpark, Amazon KDP, and more. Every score is reproducible, objective, and grounded in the same criteria used by major publishing houses.
ManuscriptIQ does not evaluate the quality of your writing, your story, or your ideas. We measure production and presentation standards — the objective, measurable criteria that determine whether your book will be accepted by distributors, respected by reviewers, and trusted by readers.
Think of it like a building inspection. The inspector doesn't judge your interior design taste — they check whether the foundation is solid, the wiring is safe, and the plumbing works. ManuscriptIQ does the same for your manuscript.
Every scan produces a reproducible score based on the same rubric. Upload the same manuscript twice and you'll get the same result. This consistency is what makes the score useful as a benchmark for improvement.
Your manuscript meets or exceeds professional publishing standards across all evaluated categories. It is ready for submission to distributors, bookstores, and award committees.
Your manuscript is close to professional standards but has specific areas that need attention. The full report identifies exactly what to fix and provides actionable recommendations.
Your manuscript has several areas that fall below professional publishing standards. These issues would likely be flagged by distributors, reviewers, or bookstore buyers.
Your manuscript has significant gaps in multiple categories. We recommend addressing the critical issues identified in your report before proceeding with publication.
Each category is scored independently. Your overall score is the sum of all category scores, weighted by importance to publishing readiness. Total possible: 100 points.
Front Matter Compliance
Weight: 8 pts
What we evaluate:
Evaluates the presence, order, and formatting of your title page, copyright notice, dedication, table of contents, and any foreword or preface.
Why it matters:
Bookstores, libraries, and distributors expect a consistent front matter sequence. Missing or misformatted pages are the most common reason manuscripts are flagged during submission.
Standards referenced:
Back Matter Completeness
Weight: 8 pts
What we evaluate:
Checks for author bio, acknowledgements, bibliography or references, index (where applicable), and 'also by' or 'about the publisher' pages.
Why it matters:
Complete back matter signals professionalism to reviewers, award committees, and library acquisition teams. It also improves discoverability through metadata.
Standards referenced:
Word Count vs. Genre Standard
Weight: 8 pts
What we evaluate:
Compares your manuscript's word count against the accepted range for your genre, based on data from published bestsellers and industry benchmarks.
Why it matters:
A manuscript that is significantly too short or too long for its genre raises red flags with agents, publishers, and readers. It also affects print cost and retail pricing.
Standards referenced:
Interior Layout and Typesetting
Weight: 10 pts
What we evaluate:
Evaluates margins, line spacing, font choice, chapter headers, running headers/footers, page numbering, orphan/widow control, and overall typographic consistency.
Why it matters:
Interior design is what separates a professional book from a self-published manuscript. Readers notice poor typesetting subconsciously — it affects readability, fatigue, and perceived quality.
Standards referenced:
Editorial Quality
Weight: 10 pts
What we evaluate:
Assesses sentence-level clarity, consistency of voice, structural coherence, and overall readability using industry-standard editorial benchmarks.
Why it matters:
Editorial quality is the single biggest factor in reader reviews. A well-edited book earns trust, repeat readers, and word-of-mouth recommendations.
Standards referenced:
ISBN and Metadata Readiness
Weight: 8 pts
What we evaluate:
Verifies ISBN placement, barcode format, BISAC subject headings, category codes, and metadata completeness for retail distribution platforms.
Why it matters:
Incorrect ISBN formatting and missing metadata are among the most common reasons self-published titles are rejected by distributors (IngramSpark Submission Guidelines). Without proper metadata, your book won't appear in the right searches, categories, or library systems.
Standards referenced:
Cover Design Standards
Weight: 10 pts
What we evaluate:
Assesses title hierarchy, author name sizing, spine readability, back cover layout (description, barcode, author bio), colour contrast, and genre signal accuracy.
Why it matters:
79% of readers say cover design influences whether they click or buy (The Book Smugglers reader survey). A cover that doesn't communicate the right genre at a glance loses sales before the reader even picks it up.
Standards referenced:
Digital and Ebook Compliance
Weight: 8 pts
What we evaluate:
Tests reflowable layout, metadata embedding, chapter navigation (NCX/TOC), image optimization, and compatibility with Kindle, Apple Books, and Kobo platforms.
Why it matters:
Ebook sales represent a significant portion of the market. A poorly formatted ebook with broken navigation or unreadable tables drives negative reviews and returns.
Standards referenced:
Distribution and Retail Readiness
Weight: 8 pts
What we evaluate:
Cross-checks your files against submission requirements for Amazon KDP, IngramSpark, Draft2Digital, and major bookstore distributors.
Why it matters:
File rejections delay your launch and cost time. Each distributor has specific requirements for bleed, trim, colour profile, and file format that must be met exactly.
Standards referenced:
Legal and Rights Compliance
Weight: 6 pts
What we evaluate:
Reviews copyright page language, permissions disclosures, rights statements, and any required legal notices for quoted material or licensed content.
Why it matters:
Incomplete or incorrect legal notices can expose you to liability and disqualify your book from certain distribution channels and award submissions.
Standards referenced:
Accessibility Standards
Weight: 8 pts
What we evaluate:
Checks alt text for images, reading order, contrast ratios, font sizing, and structural markup to ensure your book is readable by all audiences, including those using assistive technology.
Why it matters:
Accessibility is increasingly required by retailers and is a legal requirement in some jurisdictions. It also expands your potential readership significantly.
Standards referenced:
Genre-Specific Standards
Weight: 8 pts
What we evaluate:
Benchmarks your book's presentation against the top-performing titles in your specific genre for cover style, length, structure, and reader expectations.
Why it matters:
Each genre has unwritten rules. Romance readers expect a specific cover tone. Thriller readers expect a specific pacing structure. Violating these conventions reduces discoverability and reader satisfaction.
Standards referenced:
Chicago Manual of Style, 17th ed.
The definitive reference for American English grammar, usage, and editorial style.
IngramSpark Submission Guidelines
Technical specifications for print-on-demand and global distribution.
Amazon KDP Content Guidelines
Requirements for Kindle ebook and paperback publishing.
EPUB 3.0 Specification
The international standard for reflowable digital publications.
BISAC Subject Headings
The industry-standard subject classification system for books.
ISBN International Standards (ISO 2108)
The global standard for book identification numbers.